W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2008

[whatwg] reply() extension to postMessage()

From: Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:23:09 -0800
Message-ID: <278fd46c0802141123y4f84c1d9v958b518dc0d49ab3@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Adam Barth <hk9565 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>  >  This problem exists today with postMessage() too. Do people think we
>  >  should go fully asynchronous?
>
>  I had assumed it was asynchronous (and I think others might make the
>  same assumption) because the PostMessage API in Windows is
>  asynchronous.  The synchronous version in the Windows API is called
>  SendMessage.

I assumed it was asynchronous too.

- a
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 11:23:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:39 UTC