W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2008

[whatwg] HTML 5 vs. XHTML 2.0

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0802121751500.20115@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Brian Smith wrote:
> 
> If there was an <advert> element [or role='advertisement'] or 
> equivalent, then its use would quickly become a mandatory accessibility 
> requirement, and its use would pretty much be required by any site built 
> by anybody with any money to lose. Similarly, any jurisdiction with 
> "truth in advertising" laws would also require the use of such a 
> construct.

I think, with all due respect, that this is a very naiive belief. I think 
James' earlier comment is much more likely to be true.


> Ian, in your analysis of existing web content, did you find many 
> instances of advertising?

It doesn't take an analysis to know that advertising is common on the Web. :-)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 09:53:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:39 UTC