W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2008

[whatwg] MetaExtensions wiki page

From: Philipp Serafin <phil127@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:30:42 +0100
Message-ID: <494A5082.9060206@gmail.com>
Ian Hickson schrieb:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up
>>> anyway.
>>> I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still
>>> lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
>>> The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed to
>>> "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate
>>> Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
>>> Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really
>>> handled differently?
>>>       
>> They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)
>>     
>
> Actually in this instance it's the spec that will be fixed in due course.
>
>   
Thanks for the info. Didn't know mere mortals could edit that section ;)

Regards,
Philipp Serafin
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 05:30:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:46 UTC