W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2008

[whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:40:43 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600812101740w97f60cbl429433b0fcbe1071@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Dave Singer <singer at apple.com> wrote:

> At 21:33  +1300 9/12/08, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> For what it's worth, loading an intermediate document of some new type
>> which references other streams to be loaded adds a lot of complexity to the
>> browser implementation. It creates new states that the decoder can be in,
>> and introduces new failure modes. It creates new timing issues and possibly
>> new security issues.
> I'm not sure I agree;  but if you believe that, we should address it no
> matter which way this discussion goes.  It should absolutely be possible to
> reference a SMIL file, or an MP4 or MOV file with external data (to give
> only two examples) from a <video> or <audio> element, and have the DOM,
> events, states, and APis work correctly.

I agree it should be done eventually, it's just significantly more
complicated than what we have to deal with currently.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20081211/805caf8c/attachment.htm>
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 17:40:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:46 UTC