W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2008

[whatwg] Early feedback on header association algorithm

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:07:30 +0200
Message-ID: <26b395e60812020707s5989915fg46943b3f22d963b3@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Aaron Leventhal <aaronlev at moonset.net> wrote:
> Maybe there is a deeper problem if copy & paste doesn't work right because
> of IDs?
> Or maybe there should be a node.getDescendantById() method?

maybe, but not with that name.

 Results 1 - 10 of about 4,480,000 for Descendent [definition]. (0.22 seconds)
 Results 1 - 10 of about 8,370,000 for Descendant [definition]. (0.41 seconds)

the wikipedia links are confusing enough

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descendant links to:
which has an also link to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/descendant
which has a 'US' audio file

So the web says that '-dant' is favored 2:1 over '-dent', which is a
fairly bad margin considering the spelling errors we've seen in

I'd sooner see Node.getElementById and risk the confusion of it
returning fewer nodes than Document.getElementById.
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 07:07:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:46 UTC