- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:55:22 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Jeff Walden wrote: > > The spec's incomplete or vague on a few points right now. The points I > know where I forged new ground or think clarifications/explicit notes > may be in order are: > > * event.domain/uri values in a rewritten about:blank document The spec > seems to somewhat indicate that we should be using about:blank and "" as > uri/domain right now, but that's fairly useless in terms of allowing > postMessage in dynamically-created pages. This probably wants to change > to reflect the document's origin/principal, and assuming things go the > way most browsers have implemented it, this means those values are the > same as for the opener of about:blank. This is tested in > test_postMessage_special.xhtml. Note that there are two different tests > of this behavior which change the document in slightly different ways, > and Mozilla expects them to have the same results right now. Fixed. > * event.domain/uri values for IDN URLs > We use the Unicode-ized values of these, not the Punycode versions. > (Actually, that's a lie -- what we use depends on whether the relevant TLD is > whitelisted for non-punycode display or not, which is clearly the wrong > behavior; at the moment I doubt this will be fixed for Firefox 3, sadly.) I > think this is what authors would most likely expect, if not now then when IDN > is truly widespread (when we'd be stuck with punycode if we were to choose it > now), but the spec doesn't say anything about IDN yet. Fixed. [snip many other comments that either I've already replied to or that have been overtaken by events] -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 02:55:22 UTC