- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:55:49 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Jordan OSETE wrote: > > > > There's still no way to _get_ the transformation matrix, but you can > > not _set_ the transformation matrix now, which should be of help here. > > I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Isn't it the purpose of the setTransform > method? Sorry, I meant "you can now", not "you can not". My bad. > I know applications can "emulate" it by overriding the other functions, > or keeping track of it by themself, but it means significantly more work > in this case. I guess I still don't really understand what the use case is. Why would you need to know what the transformation matrix is? Why can't you just keep track of what you've done? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 17:55:49 UTC