W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2007

[whatwg] <source>

From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 02:49:11 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tpn7b9yd1h6og4@localhost>
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:36:15 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com>  
wrote:

> I don't really like this element. The name is confusing especially with  
> an attribute named src="". It also introduces yet another void element,  
> can't we just reuse <param>? The value="" attribute of <param> would  
> point to a resource and the type="" attribute (which has been dropped)  
> would be added back. I suppose it might be considered overloading, but  
> in a way we're just defining how the processing model of a plugin could  
> also work...

If you put it inside <object> fallback content, it will be misunderstood  
by the current browsers as pertaining to the <object>.


-- 
Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 18:49:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:33 UTC