- From: MegaZone <megazone@megazone.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:30:33 -0400
Once upon a time Ian Hickson shaped the electrons to say... > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote: > > From: Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> > > > Hm. Actually an <optgroup> start tag has to imply an </optgroup> end tag > > > for compatibility with browsers... spec fixed. > > Then nested optgroups as allowed in WF2 is just another thing that only > > works in XHTML5? How many sites would break if </optgroup> wasn't > > implied here? > All those that used more than one <optgroup> without mentioning > </optgroup>. I don't think that's uncommon. Yeah, I would think that the only way to imply a closing </optgroup>, really, is the </select> tag. As long as they can be nested, which was always the intent - it was just watered down in HTML 4. -MZ -- megazone-at-megazone.org http://www.MegaZone.org/ Gweep, Geek, Human, me. http://www.TiVoLovers.com/ http://www.Eyrie-Productions.com/ -><- Hail Eris "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 508-852-2171
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 16:30:33 UTC