- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:17:48 -0500
Matthew Raymond wrote: > "This specification is in no way aimed at replacing XForms 1.0 > [XForms], nor is it a subset of XForms 1.0." I agree that it's not a subset of XForms 1.0, but the first claim is pure FUD. Web Forms 2.0 happened precisely because some people didn't like XForms 1.0 and wanted to replace it with something they liked better. I'm not saying they're wrong, or that their spec is worse, but don't kid yourself about what's going on here. -- ?Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo at metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 18:17:48 UTC