W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2007

[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

From: Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:16:04 +0000
Message-ID: <n2m-g.gjueq2pevd1jjhs5fpa50vf9uo6ufrobu7@4ax.com>
"Alexey Feldgendler" <alexey at feldgendler.ru> wrote:

>> It often is, sadly. When people really, really want a grid layout model 
>> and try to fake it with positioning or floats, the result tends to be 
>> more brittle and (particularly with positioning) less fluidly scalable 
>> than a <table> layout (positioning being worse than floats but see 
>> http://dbaron.org/log/2005-12#e20051228a ).
>
>Just a side note: for grid layouts, display: table-* should be used.

CSS table layouts share all of the many drawbacks of HTML table layouts,
except for the false semantics (one of the least significant issues
IMO).

Afaics this is off topic for this list, so I'm not going to add further
to this thread spin off.

-- 
Spartanicus

(email whitelist in use, non list-server mail will not be seen)
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 04:16:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC