W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2007

[whatwg] contenteditable, <em> and <strong>

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:43:09 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tlwo98ma64w2qv@id-c0020>
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:19:43 +0100, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi> wrote:
> Compare with: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1137799947&count=1

You know, you're probably right. I'm just not there yet.


To be fair, the reason we have <em> and <strong> there in Opera is exactly  
because we got feedback from people saying they didn't want "non-semantic  
output" (we did <i> and <b> originally). It's a crazy world.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 13:43:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC