- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:15:06 +0200
Disclaimer: This is based on reasoning from the spec--not on
observing implementations.
On Jan 5, 2007, at 01:03, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. By semantics I meant what should happen
> for DOMs
> like:
>
> <p> ... <rp> ... </rp> ... </p>
Presumably a CSS-based ruby-aware UA would have rp { display: none; }
in the UA style sheet, so the above would display the way
<p> ... ... </p>
would display.
> <p> ... <rb> ... <rt> ... </rt> </rb> </p>
This one is hard.
> <p> ... <ruby> ... </ruby> </p>
Since <ruby> and <rb> don't themselves establish off-baseline text or
differently sized text, I'd expect that to render the same way as
<p> ... ... </p>
> <p> ... <ruby> ... <rb> ... <rp> ... <rt> ... <rt> </rp> </rb> </
> ruby> </p>
Again, this is hard. It seems to me the error handling in this case
isn't an HTML meaning issue but a CSS formatter issue.
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 02:15:06 UTC