W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Clarify how to indicate document hierarchy

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:20:03 +0900
Message-ID: <086596D3-E25E-44D0-B359-D34265A152E0@w3.org>

Le 14 f?vr. 2007 ? 08:12, Ian Hickson a ?crit :
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Spartanicus wrote:
>> My preference would be to have a page on the WhatWG site that  
>> links to
>> such authoring guidelines accompanied with a warning that they are  
>> not
>> necessarily endorsed by the group. The spec itself could then refer
>> people looking for more verbose usage guidelines to that page.
>
> I encourage people to write wiki pages on blog posts on this topic,
> especially if they are geared towards helping Web authors get more
> consistent authoring styles for this stuff.

It sounds like an "umbrella specification"[1] linking to the  
different parts of what is related to HTML.
   - Primer
   - Core technologies (modular or not)
   - Best Practices
     could be done on either a wiki or a site ala PHP, with the core  
definition
     and comments about this definition.



[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/#umbrella

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 21:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC