- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Spartanicus wrote: > > I'd much rather see different authors writing their own best authoring > guidelines using their own argumentation and have these compete for > adoption amongst peers. IMO some of the benefits of this are: > > * More dynamic and creative usage of the language > * No constraints on discussing the full arsenal of techniques (for > example CSS) needed to achieve the required goal > > My preference would be to have a page on the WhatWG site that links to > such authoring guidelines accompanied with a warning that they are not > necessarily endorsed by the group. The spec itself could then refer > people looking for more verbose usage guidelines to that page. I encourage people to write wiki pages on blog posts on this topic, especially if they are geared towards helping Web authors get more consistent authoring styles for this stuff. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 15:12:36 UTC