W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] W3C compatibility

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:15:20 +0000
Message-ID: <1171311320.7386.204.camel@galahad>
David Latapie asked:

> Why do you use both <span class="ex-acronym"> and <abbr 
> class="acronym">?

Because some words (usually names of organizations) begin as
abbreviations and become ex-abbreviations. That is, they officially
cease to stand for anything but are still written and pronounced as
before. What it stood for becomes of purely etymological interest. CERN
appears to be one of these:

"CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The name CERN
is derived from the French Conseil Europ?en pour la Recherche Nucl?aire,
or European Council for Nuclear Research ... When the Organization
officially came into being in 1954, the Council was dissolved, and the
new organization was given the title European Organization for Nuclear
Research, although the name CERN was retained."

http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Content/Chapters/AboutCERN/WhatIsCERN/CERNName/CERNName-en.html

On further investigation, looks like "orphan-acronym" would have been a
more recognizable class name. Other examples of "orphaned" abbreviations
include KFC, ESPN, AAA, AARP, UMIST, Texas A&M, SRI, SAT. For
discussion, see:

http://www.slate.com/id/2099747/

http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003555.html

There's even a relevant Wikipedia category:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Orphan_initialisms

> The only thing for sure is that there is a strong disagreement on the 
> terminology.

Yes. It's difficult. :(

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 12:15:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC