W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: Keryx Web <webmaster@keryx.se>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:32:41 +0100
Message-ID: <45CDBB69.1080002@keryx.se>
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
> I don't like the idea of reusing an existing presentational element such 
> as <u>. Otherwise we'd immediately have the web full of incorrect uses 
> of the element.

I agree strongly.

Rule number one: Do not confuse users. Therefore it is bad usability to 
underline anything that is not a link.

Rule number two: Do not confuse developers. If developer A starts 
building an app using <u> to mean anything else but "underlined text", 
then developer B comes along, sees all existing markup - gets confused - 
and it will take quite a while for her/him to get up to speed.

The only current element that can be used instead of <m> is <span>, like 
in <span class="highlight">, <span class="ambigous"> or <span 

I think that is good enough. We do not need need the <m> element.

Lars Gunther
Received on Saturday, 10 February 2007 04:32:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC