W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Fwd: Re: Heading, binding, LH (was:XSLT: HTML 5 --> HTML)

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:35:54 +0100
Message-ID: <20070210043554354669.3a20203e@empyree.org>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:17:54 -0500, Michel Fortin wrote:
> that the two parts (term and description) were meant to appear in 
> this particular order within a definition list because you cannot 
> formalize the term/description association if you allow <dt> and <dd> 
> to appear in any order.

Are you sure?

<dl>
	<dd>How do you call a technically brilliant but socially inept 
person?</dd>
	<dt>A nerd</dt>
</dt>

> Name-value groups may be terms and definitions, metadata topics and values, 
or any other groups of name-value data.

Don't illustrations/description couples fall in the name-value 
relationship?

> By improving the current spec, by going back to what you were using 
> with HTML4, or by ignoring the spec and doing it anyway. I'm 
> advocating the former.

So do I. But I (and other who agree with us) would have to know why it 
is not currently possible -- I mean what, out of words, prevents this 
to be possible.
-- 
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 19:35:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC