W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:21:39 +1100
Message-ID: <45CD1013.3020700@lachy.id.au>
David Latapie wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:36:25 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> <m> marks a point of interest for future reference, it does not 
>> denote importance.  Everyone seems to be focussing on the definition 
>> of highlight meaning emphasis as their argument that it is the same 
>> as <em> and/or <strong>.  However, it's the definition of mark [1], 
>> in particular "to identify an item for future reference", that is 
>> most relevant, and neither <em> nor <strong> fulfil that purpose.
> 
> Of Google cache highlighting has anything to do with future reference? 
> Or is the Google cache highlighting example a wrong one?

What?  I'm not sure I understand, but I think your putting too much 
emphasis on the word "future".  The google cache highlights the word as 
a reference for the user, which is exactly what this element is for.  It 
doesn't matter whether the user looks at it immediately, in 5 minutes, 
tomorrow, or in the distant future; it's there for when the user needs it.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 16:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC