W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:06:31 +0100
Message-ID: <20070210010631698249.9c30563b@empyree.org>
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:36:25 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> <m> marks a point of interest for future reference, it does not 
> denote importance.  Everyone seems to be focussing on the definition 
> of highlight meaning emphasis as their argument that it is the same 
> as <em> and/or <strong>.  However, it's the definition of mark [1], 
> in particular "to identify an item for future reference", that is 
> most relevant, and neither <em> nor <strong> fulfil that purpose.

Of Google cache highlighting has anything to do with future reference? 
Or is the Google cache highlighting example a wrong one?
-- 
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 16:06:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC