W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] De-emphasis

From: Nicholas Shanks <contact@nickshanks.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:09:24 +0000
Message-ID: <1C21E8B4-F7BA-4EAB-9ED9-E493F6BEB6C6@nickshanks.com>
So there have been a number of complaints that the only way to de- 
emphasize something is via <small>. I am one such complaining voice.  
There have been several suggested solutions proposed too. I would  
like to give my opinions on a few of those:


<em level="-1"> or similar attribute

My concern here is whether this is supposed to be an absolute or  
relative value. Would <em level="3"><em level="-1">this</em></em>  
result in an emphasis level of 2 (relative) or ?1 (absolute). What  
would level="+3" mean?


<de-em>, <de-emph>, <subdue> or other new element

I think a new element would be better, but the English language seems  
to lack an antonym for "emphasis".
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/emphasis
http://www.synonym.com/antonym/emphasis
Short of proposing a new word (?antiphasis" ?) and deriving an  
element from that I'm not sure there's anything that would be suitable.

Antiphasizing: the act of coughing over or mumbling something you say  
when you don't want others to hear it. ;-)


Repurposing an existing element

I don't think there's anything that would be suitable. Using <small>  
would give the wrong impression to HTML authors.


Does anyone else have better ideas?

- Nicholas.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2157 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070208/a0cdd1c2/attachment.bin>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 11:09:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC