W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: Nicholas Shanks <contact@nickshanks.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:21:08 +0000
Message-ID: <C7F364AF-CFD0-4E3F-8AB6-1A8756FDC9D8@nickshanks.com>
On 8 Feb 2007, at 18:00, David Latapie wrote:

> Problem with <mark>/<m> is that its meaning is confusing.

I don't think it's any more confusing than <hi> would be. See below...

> And still don't see any difference with <em> or <strong>. How would  
> you
> pronounce an important word? How would you pronounce a highlighted
> word? Even on the semantic level I can't see the point.

Try to compare it with <ins> and <del>, it's an element concerned  
with editing a document post-authorship, not marking up the  
document's inherent structure.

I don't think it would be confusing *provided* it was listed next to  
<ins> and <del> on all those ?Learn HTML5 in 24 Hours? sites/books/ 
specifications that people will actually learn about it from. Doing  
this would allow 99% of such people to ignore it like they currently  
ignore <ins> and <del>, and therefore won't confuse anyone.

- Nicholas.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2157 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070208/0cd8db43/attachment.bin>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC