W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:20:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3BB9A4EA-7AD5-4492-8CFA-FFB4534A5E1A@googlemail.com>

On 8 Feb 2007, at 15:23, Leons Petrazickis wrote:

> In the Western world, the standard for highlighting is a neon yellow
> background. I submit that a much better name for <m> is <hi>
> (<hilite>, <highlite>, <highlight>). People don't necessarily mark
> text much -- if anything, "mark" implies underlining, circling, and
> drawing arrows -- but they do highlight. In university, I often saw
> students perched with their notes and a highlighter, marking important
> sections. The semantic meaning is to draw attention for later review.

In my eyes such an element is presentational ? a more generic  
element, but one with semantic meaning, like <m> is far more relevant  
(although it may well be a good idea to suggest it be rendered as  
highlighted).


- Geoffrey Sneddon
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:20:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC