W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] The m element

From: David Walbert <dwalbert@learnnc.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:50:06 -0500
Message-ID: <386D9985-6C35-41FF-BE70-2FA50CCFCEAF@learnnc.org>

On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:14 AM, David Latapie wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:59:44 -0500, David Walbert wrote:
>> I would be less concerned that it's a single letter than that "m" and
>> "em" are pronounced identically
> On the top of my head...


Fine -- you have me here on details -- but they are still similar in  
the languages you noted; they are only one letter apart; and given  
that the tag "em" is short for the English word "emphasis" (and  
despite any phonetic wrangling you might provide is pronounced just  
like the letter m by every English speaker with whom I work) I still  
say this is a problem. Elements so similar in meaning should have  
unmistakably different tags to avoid confusion. Confusion on <em> is  
bad enough already.

David Walbert
LEARN NC, UNC-Chapel Hill
dwalbert at learnnc.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070208/d2aecfe1/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC