- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:21:47 +0200
On Feb 6, 2007, at 14:04, Elliotte Harold wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> My parser[1] doesn't follow the WA10 parsing algorithm, either, >> *yet*. However, as a tentative Pythonless Java solution, you could >> use it together with a RELAX NG validator in the pipeline (using >> the whattf.org schemas[2]) to implement Draconian failure in cases >> where the error recovery would kick in as per the WA10 parsing >> algorithm. > > Java's certainly more attractive to me than Python. I think I'd > avoid Draconian error handling for the initial step and just see > what comes out at the end. My parser, in its current version, is designed with the assumption that it is used together with a sane RELAX NG schema. If used alone without a validation layer with non-conforming input, it will (by design) produce non-conforming output. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 04:21:47 UTC