[whatwg] Ogg content on the Web

On 12 Dec 2007, at 19:30, Maik Merten wrote:

> Geoffrey Sneddon schrieb:
>> Apart from those two, the others I can think of are those that are in
>> excess of twenty years old (and therefore their patents have  
>> expired),
>> such as H.260.
>
> I couldn't find anything insightful about "H.260". Sure you don't mean
> H.120, which is a 1982 video codec I couldn't find a current
> implementation of?

Yeah. I always miscall it H.260 (as it is the precursor to H.261).

> H.261, OTOH, is a 1990 standard and thus still a bit away from getting
> absolutely free.

Though, by the time we reach LC, it may not be.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:34:06 UTC