W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2007

[whatwg] more discussion regarding codecs (Was: whatwg Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16)

From: bofh <goodb0fh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:23:25 -0500
Message-ID: <6ead893e0712120523x22d03537w546d88e3a58a0036@mail.gmail.com>
On Dec 12, 2007 1:07 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> what the courts say than with what the patents say. If Apple say they
> don't want to implement Ogg, then we have to find another solution.
>
> (Similarly -- Opera, Mozilla, et al, don't want to implement H.264. So we
> have to find a solution other than H.264.)

Thank  you for your reply.  From what you just said, I'm afraid we're
stuck between a rock and a hard place, and would not be able to
resolve it.

This is really too bad.


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks
factory where smoking on the job is permitted."  -- Gene Spafford
learn french:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 05:23:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:38 UTC