- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:27:44 +0100
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:13 -0700, Kevin Marks wrote: > My point is that this is breaking the expected containment of <dt><dd> > in a <dl>- if you want a new structure purely for dialog, define > <speaker> and keep <q>. I really fail to see why redefining a > definition list as speech is less 'proper' than expanding the context > of <q> slightly. IMHO it's not a slight expansion. The <dialog> proposal does not redefine dt or dd as speech. It provides a particular context for terms (speakers) and definitions (speeches): a usage supported by the HTML 4.01 specification. (Again, I'd prefer specific elements for dialogues.) -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 13:27:44 UTC