- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:55:16 +0100
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:52:06 +0100, Lachlan Hunt
<lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote:
> I see. How about including that example in the spec and rephrasing
> first additional requirement like this:
>
> * Replacing each noscript element with its child elements must not
> cause the document to become non-conforming.
That doesn't work for HTML where <noscript> content is typically parsed
(when scripting is enabled) as CDATA.
I'm wondering though if the following is invalid per the current text:
<li>
<noscript><m>test</m></noscript>
<ins><p>test</p></ins>
</li>
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 26 November 2006 12:55:16 UTC