- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 02:46:45 +0200
On Oct 23, 2006, at 21:31, Ian Hickson wrote: > I think cells extending (via colspan/rowspan) into columns or rows > that > contain no cells other than extended cells should be at least a SHOULD > NOT, maybe a MUST NOT. Wouldn't it be sufficient and more desirable to require each row to have at least one cell that starts on that row and each column to have at least one cell that starts in that column? (By starts I mean having the top left corner there.) This would allow tables like this: 112 344 and 12 13 43 (Where numbers denote cells so that 11 means a cell spanning two columns.) Browsers don't choke: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/wa10/tables/extended-cells.html -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 16:46:45 UTC