W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2006

[whatwg] <input type="text" accept="">

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 18:30:22 -0700
Message-ID: <20060609013022.GA2889@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2006-06-09 01:17 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Given that requiring a new flag per feature is not an option (as, as 
> mentioned before, it would require a central authority to add these 
> features, slowing the introduction of new features and discouraging 
> experimentation), what solution would you propose instead?

I think it is an option, and I don't see why you're so insistent that it
isn't.  Authors are actually going to want interoperability; to get
that, it's required.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
           Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060608/1a9994da/attachment.pgp>
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 18:30:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:27 UTC