W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2006

[whatwg] <input type="text" accept="">

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 18:02:04 -0700
Message-ID: <20060609010204.GA8530@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2006-06-09 00:42 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, L. David Baron wrote:
> > > 
> > > I don't see why the same attribute _shouldn't_ be used to determine 
> > > the type of data to allow, and whether to do spell checking or not. 
> > > After all, whether to spell-check is directly related to what kind of 
> > > data it is.
> > 
> > This sounds a lot like <object>, which allowed for tons of features but 
> > didn't specify them precisely.  Are you planning to specify exactly what 
> > the semantics of every MIME type are for all of these features?
> 
> No, because I don't know what those are, and want to allow for browser 
> vendors to increase their feature set without having to have the spec 
> updated each time.
> 
> It doesn't seem like this is an area that requires interoperability (who 
> cares if one browser auto-indents and another colours and spell-checks, 
> other than the user of each browser?).

The original use case, as I understand it, was roughly "authors want to
disable spell checking on some textareas".  Is the reason that they want
to disable spellchecking only that the contents are not "text/plain"?  I
doubt it.  Doing what you propose, especially if it is extended to other
features, will just encourage authors to use incorrect MIME types to get
particular side-effects in particular user agents.

It seems more likely to be that the textarea is expected to contain a
particular type of text, such as abbreviations or some form of code.
The content is unlikely to have an assigned MIME type.  I suppose one
could be made up, but that would presumably disable everything a UA did
on the basis of the contents, which wouldn't necessarily be appropriate.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
           Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20060608/0842165a/attachment.pgp>
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 18:02:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:27 UTC