- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:45:31 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Shadow2531 wrote: > > <? is a parse error and causes a switch to the bogus comment state. > > So, <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href=""?> is a bogus comment. > <http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#bogus> > > "Emit a comment token whose data is the concatenation of all the > characters from the character that caused the state machine to switch > into the bogus comment state, up to the last consumed character before > the U+003E character..." > > I *was* 100% sure that the PI should be parsed into: > > <!--?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href=""?--> Correct. > However, after rereading that section a few more times, I'm not 100% > sure whether the 2 ? are included in the concatenation or not? > > I know it says from ? up to ?, but I might be interpreting 'from' and > 'up to' incorrectly. > > Can someone clarify? I've tried to clarify the spec. Let me know if it's still ambiguous. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:45:31 UTC