W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2006

[whatwg] Definition of alt= attribute

From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:11:29 -0500
Message-ID: <43D224F1.9060901@earthlink.net>
Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:25:12 +0600, Matthew Raymond  
> <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>    Hmm... Is <img> ever non-presentational? Radical thought: Deprecate
>> <img>.
> Why? Aren't there semantic images?

   Might be. As Anne suggests, a picture of a product might be a good
example. It was more of a question than a serious suggestion.

> Maybe instead deprecate <img> for presentational images, leaving it only  
> for semantic images (with non-empty alt required).

   Sounds like a good idea. We should probably also consider how
<object> fits into this, though. Can it completely replace <img>??? It
certainly has better support for fallback content.
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 04:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:25 UTC