W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2006

[whatwg] <BIG> Element

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:20:05 +1100
Message-ID: <43C82795.3010407@lachy.id.au>
Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
> I noticed that there is a <SMALL> element, but no <BIG> element. Is 
> there a specific reason for this?

Both of them are quite presentational, but there is an attempt to 
redefine the small element with some semantic meaning.  The same cannot 
be said for big, it is (and probably always will be) presentational, and 
therefore has no place in a semantic markup language.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 14:20:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:25 UTC