W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2006

[whatwg] <a href="" ping="">

From: dolphinling <dolphinling@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:34:40 -0500
Message-ID: <43C4C320.9010100@myrealbox.com>
dolphinling wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, dolphinling wrote:
>>> Like I said before, I like the semantics of ping=. But it doesn't fit 
>>> into the usage model that advertisers and other trackers want. 
>>> Semantically, I want notification and linking to be separate. In 
>>> usage, they want them to be linked. They seem to me to be mutually 
>>> exclusive.
>>
>> In my experience, "they" are ok with it being separate, as it conveys 
>> a number of benefits to the user. (I would consider my source on this 
>> matter reasonably authoritative.)
> 
> Hmm... perhaps your source could explain his reasoning here? :) It's 
> extremely easy to make non-circumventable tracking, and I assumed that 
> most times it _was_ circumventable were due to ignorance rather than an 
> informed decision. To me, it seems, the benefits to an advertising 
> company of doing so outweigh the benefits of not.

I'd still like to hear this reasoning for this :)

(Noticed that this just got implemented in mozilla, which is what 
brought it to mind).

-- 
dolphinling
<http://dolphinling.net/>
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 00:34:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:25 UTC