W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2006

[whatwg] After attribute name state

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:54:02 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0601090048250.9516@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> The After attribute name state section[1] now says that the attribute 
> value will be the empty string for "Anything else", which is not true in 
> all cases. (I know it's WIP, and I know you know about this, but still.)
> Boolean attributes. <table border> is the same as <table border="1">, 
> and contenteditable is the same as contenteditable="true" (at least in 
> IE, not in Opera). There are probably some other exceptions aswell.
> [1] http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#after

Yeah... I'm still trying to work out how to handle these cases. I need to 
compare cases like:

   <table border>
   <table border=>
   <table border="">

...as well as things like:

   setAttribute('border', null);

...and so forth, to work out exactly how UAs generally behave. (We know 
that they don't really implement what HTML4 says, e.g. <input radio> 
doesn't do the same as <input type="radio">.)

If we can get away with it, making <a b> always be exactly equivalent to 
<a b=""> and setAttribute('b', '') would be ideal, as it would simplify a 
lot of things. I've already sort of gone that route with attribute 
definitions, e.g. saying that "the b attribute does bla when it is present 
and bleh when it is not; if it is present it must have the value b", which 
gives one set of criteria for UAs and one set of criteria for authors.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 8 January 2006 16:54:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:25 UTC