- From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:12:05 +0100
2006/12/21, Simon Pieters: > > From: "Thomas Broyer" > >Additional note: as I read this, if the DOCTYPE was previously marked > >as being "in error", it should then be rolled back to being "correct" > >if the DOCTYPE name is "HTML": <!DOCTYPEHTML> would *not* be marked > >"in error". > > Correct. > > >That's probably not what's intended. > > It is intended. Browsers trigger standards mode for <!doctypehtml>. It does, > however, generate a parse error, but the doctype itself is not "in error". OK, understood; thanks a lot. -- Thomas Broyer
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 14:12:05 UTC