W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2006

[whatwg] microformats incompatible with WebApps 1.0 ?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612112217410.16529@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, James Graham wrote:
> 
> I am really quite concerned about the use of a global namespace to 
> associate classnames with semantics. This raises the possibility of 
> collisions between people who are expecting the class attribute to be an 
> opaque, semantic-free string, similar to the way that it was defined in 
> HTML 4, and those who are in the know about the existence of a global 
> registry and diligently register all the classnames that they use before 
> publishing anything.

I agree.


> I'm not sure what the solution to this problem is.

Me neither. Suggestions welcome.


> I think the situation would be considerably better if people were able 
> to register classname _prefixes_, so that people could use classnames of 
> the form microformatName_propertyName with microformatName registered. 
> This may require changes to the syntax of existing microformats for use 
> in HTML 5. I don't know if people would find that acceptable, but I 
> think the current proposal is, at least, unworkable.

The current proposal is a superset of this -- there's no reason that "the 
community" that eventually decides to gate the class names couldn't 
enforce such a policy. It doesn't actually change the spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 14:19:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC