W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2006

[whatwg] Provding Better Tools

From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:52:49 -0500
Message-ID: <030501c719bb$8e8a1020$0702a8c0@Guides.local>
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> It's not up to a specification to specify a 
>> conformance requirement stating which 
>> implementations can be used, nor mandating 
>> particular implementation details. 

By providing the suggest test I was trying to get people to use a conforming
component for all the reasons I previously stated that most won't.  You do
agree that's a worthy goal, right?  You've said as much in numerous prior
posts.  If so, how can something be put in the spec to get people to use a
conforming component?

-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 20:52:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC