W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > December 2006

[whatwg] The list of void elements

From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:41:43 +0600
Message-ID: <op.tj4qftxx1h6og4@feldgendler.plesk.ru>
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:37:34 +0600, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:

>>>> http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#elements lists the
>>>> elements which are considered void. The <command> and <event-source>
>>>> also have empty content model, so shouldn't they end up there as well?

>>> That's in fact mentioned in the source code.

>> Is there a reason why they are commented out?

> Looking at the current list it seems that those are the only two that
> haven't been "well defined" in the draft yet. (<input> is defined in Web
> Forms 2.)

At least <command> has an "official" definition like other elements.


-- 
Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 00:41:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:31 UTC