- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:31:16 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> | All child elements must be processed, according to their semantics,
> | before the style element itself is evaluated.
>
> Ok, that's a little improvement, but it should probably say "All
> [descendant] elements..."
Yeah, good call.
*fixes spec*
*fixes other spec from which he copied that text*
> So let me see if I get this right:
>
> <style id="s1">
> .one { background:red }
> .two { background:lime }
> <p>
> .two { background:red }
> <style id="s2">
> .one { background:lime }
> .three { background:lime }
> </style>
> </p>
> .three { background:red }
> </style>
>
> In that case, the result passed to the style system will be equivalent to:
>
> From #s1:
> .one { background:red }
> .two { background:lime }
> .three { background:red }
>
> From #s2:
> .one { background:lime }
> .three { background:lime }
>
> Is that correct?
Yes (including the order).
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2005 18:31:16 UTC