W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > October 2005

[whatwg] <a href="" ping="">

From: Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper@album.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:04:16 +1300
Message-ID: <1130274257.3807.10.camel@jasper.local>
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 13:57 -0700, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 10/21/05, S. Mike Dierken <mike at dierken.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Or is it just "hitting" -- making an hidden HTTP GET request of each
> > > > token in the "ping" attibute?
> > >
> > > Right. Hidden HTTP POST request, as it happens, but yes.
> > Oh, that really shouldn't be done via POST. Clicking a link should be safe
> > and sending a POST as a side-effect is not safe.
> 
> Yeah, that's my thinking too.  Perhaps we could use a totally new HTTP
> method for this (instead of "GET", "POST", or any of the other
> existing ones out there).  Maybe "PING"

I'm not sure where this idea has come from that sending POSTs is
inherently unsafe (which, by the way, no-one has offered a good
explanation for yet).

There's nothing wrong with POST being used for this purpose IMHO, but
I'd be very interested to hear arguments to the contrary.

-- 
Jasper Bryant-Greene
General Manager
Album Limited

e: jasper at album.co.nz
w: http://www.album.co.nz/
p: 0800 4 ALBUM (0800 425 286) or +64 21 232 3303
a: PO Box 579, Christchurch 8015, New Zealand
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 14:04:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:24 UTC