[whatwg] WA 1.0 and WF 2

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, ROBO Design wrote:
> > 
> > Right, the WF2 spec contains the WF3 wishlist at the end, and the WA1 
> > spec contains notes all over the place.
> > 
> > Why not? People have found the WF3 notes useful. I agree they 
> > shouldn't be visible, but what's wrong with having them as comments?
> 
> It is interesting ... but ... 'weird' to me at least :).

Heh. Well, weird is not necessarily bad. :-)


> > I might provide a split version in due course but it would be a lot of 
> > work so I'm not planning on doing it any time soon. I'd rather cut 
> > features out, to be honest.
> 
> A split version would be good, but only for final. I know it takes time 
> and work, that's why only for final.

Yes, I do intend to work on a split version when the spec is finished.


Thanks,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 15:41:08 UTC