[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

Also sprach Dean Edwards:

 > >> Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known 
 > >> and used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if 
 > >> the type is actually IRI), go for URL.

 > > I agree. URL is the only term that will be understood by the vast 
 > > majority of authors.

 > I've never known this group to be in such agreement!

We've found another one! 

  Evolution -- lowercase semantics -- microformats -- urls!

-h&kon
              H?kon Wium Lie                          CTO ??e??
howcome at opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 14:35:29 UTC