[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

Ian Hickson wrote:
> Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel 
> strongly about this.

Consistency with CSS is a very good point. URL is more widely known and 
used than URI, and since both are technically incorrect anyway (if the 
type is actually IRI), go for URL.

regards
Olav Junker Kj?r

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:48:22 UTC