- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:27:26 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, James Graham wrote:
> >
> > The problem is if I state one thing explicitly, then people will want
> > something else stated ("does it allow IDNs?" "does it allow UTF-8
> > characters?" "does it allow fragment identifiers?"). Why should one
> > aspect of something be redundantly stated?
>
> Because it's identified by people who do read RFCs as an obvious and
> problematic source of confusion for those who don't.
So are the others. :-) But fair enough. Added a note.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 17:27:26 UTC