W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 - what does it extend , definition of same,

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:55:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501191338330.2325@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, James Graham wrote:
> > 
> > The ideal is both, users with different needs have big problems using 
> > generic UA's by providing semantic mark-up, it's trivial to create new 
> > views on the same data - think how easy Mathew Somervilles Accessible 
> > Odeon scraping would've been had they based their system on iCal.
>
> Indeed. They could have used HTML 4's <link rel="alternate"> to point to 
> the iCal data from the HTML page. Sadly, the convenience of building up 
> HTML directly from the underlying database (not to mention the 
> incompetence of Odeon) meant they didn't feel the need to insert an 
> extra layer of abstraction between their db and the web page.

Note the current (work in progress) proposal to allow iCal content to be 
mechanically integrated into HTML documents in a backwards-compatible 
manner:

   http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#calendars
   http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/hCalendar


> Sure I would like it it everyone communicated everything freely using 
> standard languages correctly. Realistically, it isn't going to happen.

Sad to say, but you're right.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 05:55:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC