W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 Feedback

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:21:51 +0000
Message-ID: <41DD659F.2040509@cam.ac.uk>
James Graham wrote:

> Is there anything indicated that uses <li>? It could just use 
> coincidence on the same page (indeed, that seems more likely). In any 
> case that (in it's present form) is very much on the verge of what I 
> would describe as "useful".
>
Sorry, that was really mangled. Let's try again:
Is there anything that indicates that Google Sets uses <li>? It could 
just use coincidence on the same page (indeed, that seems more likely). 
In any case that (in its present form) is very much on the verge of what 
I would describe as "useful".
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2005 08:21:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC