W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2005

[whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 - what does it extend , definition of same, relation to XForms, implementation reqs.

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:29:31 +0200
Message-ID: <A5A4B244-5DA4-11D9-A38A-003065B8CF0E@iki.fi>
On Jan 1, 2005, at 20:13, Bill McCoy wrote:

> Whereas Web Forms 2.0, being a script-intensive solution built on an
> ill-defined non-XML language is clearly not going to be nearly as easy 
> to
> handle in server-based workflows. Indeed one of the world's largest web
> sites maintains a large-scale Windows server stack merely to run MSHTML
> server-side. While keeping web documents arcane and difficult to 
> process may
> be a source of commercial advantage to browser manufacturers it 
> doesn't seem
> like a great solution for the industry as a whole.

I assume you mean HTML when you say "ill-defined non-XML language", 
because Web Forms 2.0 supports an XML submission format.

Non-Microsoft enterprise server systems that deal with XML are 
typically implemented in Java. Processing HTML as XML in Java-based 
systems is a solved problem. The app internals are written for XHTML 
and conversion is done on the IO boundary. TagSoup by John Cowan is 
used on input an HTML serializer[2] is used on output.

If it looks better, one could consider WF 2.0 syntax an extension the 
XHTML that has been immediately backported to HTML. :-)

[1] http://mercury.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/tagsoup/
[2] eg. 

Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
Received on Monday, 3 January 2005 08:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC